|
|
| [1] Teaching Discipled vs Agile process |
| Authors: |
Robillard P. N., Dulipovici M. |
| Reference: |
Intl Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 24, No. 4 |
| Page(s): |
1-10 |
| Date/Year: |
Jul. 2008 |
| None available. |
|
| [2] Towards a Refined Paradigm for Architecturing Usable Systems |
| Authors: |
RAFLA, Tamer, Desmarais Michel, C., and Robillard Pierre N. |
| Reference: |
In Human-Centered Software engineering, Volume II, Wiley, New York |
| Page(s): |
225-235 |
| Date/Year: |
May. 2007 |
| None available. |
|
| [3] Changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology : a study of software technical review meetings |
| Authors: |
D’Astous, P., Détienne F., Visser W., Robillard, P.N. |
| Reference: |
Design Studies, Vol 25, issue 6 |
| Page(s): |
625-655 |
| Date/Year: |
Nov. 2004 |
| None available. |
|
| [4] Process innovation imperative [software product development organisation] |
| Authors: |
van Zyl, J. |
| Reference: |
Change Management and the New Industrial Revolution, 200. IEMC '01 Proceedings. |
| Page(s): |
454-459 |
| Date/Year: |
2001 |
| This work proposes a complete framework that can be used by software producing organisations to innovate, build, and deliver software products to market. This paper introduces the strategic product development model, learning model and people maturity model as tools to use during the evolutionary or revolutionary cycles the organisation will go through in its life cycle. |
|
| [5] Software renewal process comprehension using dynamic effort estimation |
| Authors: |
Caivano, D.; Lanubile, F.; Visaggio, G. |
| Reference: |
Software Maintenance, 2001. Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on |
| Page(s): |
209-218 |
| Date/Year: |
2001 |
| Présentation d’une méthode dynamique de l’estimation de l’effort avec un outil et une validation par une application à un projet |
|
| [6] Towards a tool support for a living software development process |
| Authors: |
Gnatz, M.; Marschall, F.; Popp, G.; Rausch, A.; Schwerin, W. |
| Reference: |
System Sciences, 2001. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on |
| Page(s): |
1172-1180 |
| Date/Year: |
2001 |
| In this paper we propose a process model framework which is modularly structured on the basis of the concept of Process Patterns. |
|
| [7] Software quality enhancement through software process optimization using Taguchi methods |
| Authors: |
Kanchana, B.; Sarma, V.V.S. |
| Reference: |
Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 1999. Proceedings. ECBS '99. IEEE Conference and Workshop on |
| Page(s): |
188-193 |
| Date/Year: |
1999 |
| This paper presents a methodology for selection of optimal software design parameters using the experimental design. |
|
| [8] COO approach to support cooperation in software developments |
| Authors: |
Canals, G.; Godart, C.; Charoy, F.; Molli, P.; Skaf, H. |
| Reference: |
Software, IEE Proceedings-, Volume: 145 Issue: 2 |
| Page(s): |
79-84 |
| Date/Year: |
April-June 1998 |
| The COO system proposes a framework to organise the cooperation between developers of complex software systems. The key idea of COO is to base software process correctness on a safe transaction model: COO promotes an original advanced transaction model which integrates some general properties that define a very permissive core synchronisation protocol, and process specific knowledge that allows the gearing of the core protocol towards process characteristics. |
|
| [9] A framework for adaptive process modeling and execution (FAME) |
| Authors: |
Benjamin, P.; Erraguntla, M.; Mayer, R.; Painter, M.; Marshall, C. |
| Reference: |
Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 1998. (WET ICE '98) Proceedings., Seventh IEEE International Workshops on |
| Page(s): |
3-9 |
| Date/Year: |
1998 |
| The paper describes the architecture and concept of operation of a Framework for Adaptive Process Modeling and Execution (FAME). The research addresses the absence of robust methods for supporting the software process management life cycle. |
|
| [10] An environment for reusing software processes |
| Authors: |
Henninger, S. |
| Reference: |
Software Reuse, 1998. Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on |
| Page(s): |
103-112 |
| Date/Year: |
1998 |
| In this paper, a method is introduced that embeds reusable information in a process model that is customized to the specific needs of development efforts. |
|
| [11] REP-chaRacterising and Exploiting Process components: results of experimentation |
| Authors: |
Fusaro, P.; Tortorella, M.; Visaggio, G. |
| Reference: |
Reverse Engineering, 1998. Proceedings. Fifth Working Conference on |
| Page(s): |
20-29 |
| Date/Year: |
1998 |
| The approach REP, chaRacterising and Exploiting Process components, has been previously proposed by the authors. It includes a characterisation framework which serves to support the comprehension and evaluation of the process components being analysed. The aim of this paper is to verify whether the approach is effective if suitably used, by means of a controlled experiment testing the ability of the characterisation framework to formalise and evaluate a process component. |
|
| [12] Rapid development of robotic applications using component-based real-time software |
| Authors: |
Stewart, D.B.; Khosla, P.K. |
| Reference: |
Intelligent Robots and Systems 95. 'Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots', Proceedings. 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on , Volume: 1 |
| Page(s): |
465-470 vol.1 |
| Date/Year: |
1995 |
| It enables the use of rapid prototyping or incremental software process models. The Chimera Methodology is a software engineering paradigm targeted at developing and integrating dynamically reconfigurable and reusable real-time software components. It is founded upon the notion of port-based objects. The focus of this paper is how to apply the Chimera Methodology specifically to the development of robotic applications. |
|
|
|